The magnitude is \(|\vec{A}\times\vec{B}|=AB\sin\theta\), and the direction is given by the right-hand rule.
Remark
The vector \(\vec{A}\times\vec{B}\) is perpendicular to both \(\vec{A}\) and \(\vec{B}\). If the two vectors are parallel or antiparallel, their cross product is zero.
This scalar represents the signed volume of the parallelepiped formed by \(\vec{A}\), \(\vec{B}\), and \(\vec{C}\).
Remark
If \(\vec{A}\cdot(\vec{B}\times\vec{C})=0\), the three vectors are coplanar. The sign of this product distinguishes right-handed and left-handed orientations.
This identity is commonly known as the BAC–CAB rule. The resulting vector lies in the plane of \(\vec{B}\) and \(\vec{C}\).
Figure 6.2. A particle of mass \(m\) in rigid rotation about an axis through \(O\) with angular velocity \(\vec{\omega}\), at position \(\vec{r}\) and moving with velocity \(\vec{v}\).Example - Angular Momentum for Rigid Rotation
For a particle in rigid rotation with angular velocity \(\vec{\omega}\), the velocity is
This form shows that the angular momentum is parallel to the angular velocity, with magnitude proportional to the moment of inertia \(I=m r^{2}\).
6.2Differentiation of Vectors
In physics, many vector quantities—such as position, velocity, and acceleration—vary with time or with spatial coordinates. We therefore need rules for differentiating and integrating vectors.
Definition - Derivative of a Vector
If a vector \(\vec{A}\) depends on a variable \(t\), its derivative with respect to \(t\) is defined as
The derivative of a vector may change the magnitude, the direction, or both. For instance, in uniform circular motion, \(|\vec{r}|\) is constant but \(\vec{r}\) changes direction continuously, producing a nonzero \(\frac{d \vec{r}}{d t}\).
Example - Velocity and Acceleration in Different Coordinate Systems
\begin{equation}
\begin{aligned}
v_{\rho} &= \frac{d\rho}{dt}
&\text{linear velocity in the radial direction},\\[4pt]
v_{\phi} &= \rho\,\frac{d\phi}{dt}
&\text{tangential (angular) velocity around the $z$-axis},\\[4pt]
v_{z} &= \frac{dz}{dt}
&\text{linear velocity along the $z$-axis}.
\end{aligned}
\end{equation}
\begin{equation}
\frac{d}{dt}(m\vec{A})
= \frac{dm}{dt}\,\vec{A} + m\frac{d\vec{A}}{dt},
\qquad \text{where $m$ is a scalar function of $t$.}
\end{equation}
Examples: velocity field of a fluid, electric and magnetic fields.
Remark
At each point \((x,y,z)\), the scalar field gives one number, while the vector field gives three component functions that can vary continuously throughout space.
Figure 6.3. The gradient \(\vec{\nabla}\phi\) is perpendicular to the level curve \(\phi=\text{const}\), and its projection on a direction \(\vec{u}\) is the directional derivative \(d\phi/ds\) in that direction.Remark
The gradient \(\vec{\nabla}\phi\) points in the direction of maximum increase of \(\phi\), and its magnitude \(|\vec{\nabla}\phi|\) gives the maximum rate of increase per unit distance.
Example - Directional Derivative
Find the directional derivative of
\begin{equation}
\phi = x^2y + xz
\end{equation}
at the point \((1,2,-1)\) in the direction of the vector
If we consider a surface \(\phi(x,y,z)=\text{constant}\), and let \(\hat{t}\) be a unit tangent vector to this surface at some point, then the directional derivative of \(\phi\) along the tangent direction is zero:
Thus, \(\vec{A}\) and \(\vec{A}+\vec{B}\) represent fields with a uniform outward expansion (a source flow), while \(\vec{B}\) has zero divergence — a purely rotational flow.
(b) Curl
In two dimensions, only the \(z\)–component of the curl is nonzero:
\(\vec{A}\): Field lines radiate outward from the origin — a pure source field. \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{A} > 0\), \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A} = 0.\)
\(\vec{B}\): Field lines form closed circles — a pure rotational (vortex) field. \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{B} = 0\), \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{B} \neq 0.\)
\(\vec{A}+\vec{B}\): Field lines spiral outward — a combination of source and rotation. Both divergence and curl are nonzero, producing a spiral flow.
Figure 6.5. Field lines of \(\vec{A}\), of \(\vec{B}\), and of their sum: a pure source, a pure rotation, and the spiral flow that has both a divergence and a curl.
Visualization \(k=1\) and \(\omega=1 \)
Left: Pure source — arrows radiate outward uniformly.
Middle: Pure rotation — arrows circle around the origin.
Divergence quantifies the presence of sources or sinks.
Curl quantifies the local rotation of the field.
Example
Consider a rigid body rotating about the \(z\)-axis with a constant angular velocity \(\vec{\omega} = \omega\,\hat{k}\). Let the position vector of a point in the body be
We use the Cartesian definition \(\displaystyle \nabla^{2}f=\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial x^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial y^{2}}+\frac{\partial^{2} f}{\partial z^{2}}\).
\begin{equation}
\boxed{\;\nabla^{2} f
= \left(6x\right)+\left(-6x+6y\right)+0
= 6y.\;}
\end{equation}
Useful Vector Identities
Theorem - Common Vector Identities
\(\vec{\nabla}\cdot(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{A}) = 0.\)Physical meaning: This identity states that the divergence of a curl is always zero. In physical terms, a rotational (circulating) field such as a magnetic field has no net source or sink. For example, \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec{B}=0\) in Maxwell’s equations expresses that there are no magnetic monopoles.
\(\vec{\nabla}\times(\vec{\nabla}\phi) = \vec{0}.\)Physical meaning: This states that the curl of a gradient is always zero. It means that any field derived from a scalar potential (such as the electrostatic field \(\vec{E} = -\vec{\nabla}V\)) is irrotational—it has no circulation or rotational component.
Vector Differential Operators in a General Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinate System
In many physical problems, Cartesian coordinates \((x,y,z)\) are not always the most convenient choice. We often use other coordinate systems such as cylindrical \((\rho,\phi,z)\) or spherical \((r,\theta,\phi)\), which are examples of orthogonal curvilinear coordinates.
Definition - Orthogonal Curvilinear Coordinates
Let a point in space be described by three parameters \((u_1,u_2,u_3)\), related to Cartesian coordinates by
\begin{equation}
x = x(u_1,u_2,u_3), \qquad
y = y(u_1,u_2,u_3), \qquad
z = z(u_1,u_2,u_3).
\end{equation}
The coordinate system is called orthogonal if the coordinate lines intersect at right angles everywhere.
At each point, define:
\(\hat{u}_1, \hat{u}_2, \hat{u}_3\): unit vectors tangent to the coordinate lines \(u_1, u_2, u_3\);
\(h_1, h_2, h_3\): scale factors (or metric coefficients) defined by
These operators describe spatial variation of scalar and vector fields, and their expressions depend on the coordinate system and corresponding unit vectors.
In differential form, Maxwell’s equations describe the behavior of electric and magnetic fields in space and time. They connect the electric field \(\vec{E}\), magnetic field \(\vec{B}\), charge density \(\rho\), and current density \(\vec{J}\).
Theorem - Maxwell’s Equations (Differential Form in Vacuum with Sources)
Figure 6.6. What Maxwell's equations relate. The free charge density \(\rho_f(\vec{r}\,',t)\) and free current density \(\vec{J}_f(\vec{r}\,',t)\) at the source point are given; the fields \(\vec{E}(\vec{r},t)\) and \(\vec{B}(\vec{r},t)\) at the field point are what is to be found.
A circulating magnetic field is produced by electric currents \(\vec{J}\) and by changing electric fields \(\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}\).
The second term (\(\mu_0\epsilon_0\frac{\partial \vec{E}}{\partial t}\)) is the displacement current density, introduced by Maxwell to ensure charge conservation.
Figure 6.7. Divergence and curl side by side. Left: the flux of \(\vec{E}\) out of a closed surface enclosing a charge \(+q\), which integrates to Gauss's law. Right: the circulation of \(\vec{E}\) around a loop threaded by a changing \(\vec{B}\), which integrates to Faraday's law.
Derivation of the Electromagnetic Wave Equation
We now derive how Maxwell’s equations predict that changing electric and magnetic fields propagate as waves in vacuum. In Vacuum (no charges or currents): \(\rho_f = 0\), \(\vec{J}_f = 0.\) Then Maxwell’s equations become:
These are wave equations for \(\vec{E}\) and \(\vec{B}\), describing electromagnetic waves propagating through space.
The wave speed.
Comparing with the standard wave equation \(\nabla^2 u = \dfrac{1}{v^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2} u}{\partial t^{2}}\), whose solutions travel at speed \(v\), we can read off the speed of an electromagnetic wave:
Substituting the measured constants \(\mu_0 = 4\pi\times10^{-7}\ \mathrm{T\,m/A}\) and \(\epsilon_0 = 8.85\times10^{-12}\ \mathrm{C^2/(N\,m^2)}\) gives \(c \approx 3.00\times10^{8}\ \mathrm{m/s}\) — the measured speed of light. This is the historical significance of the calculation: two constants obtained from benchtop experiments on static electricity and on magnets combine to give the speed of light, which is what identified light itself as an electromagnetic wave.
Figure 6.8. An electromagnetic wave: \(\vec{E}\) and \(\vec{B}\) oscillate perpendicular to each other and to the direction of travel.
6.7Vector Integrals
In vector calculus, integrals of scalar or vector functions can be defined over curves, surfaces, or volumes. These are classified as:
The work done depends only on the values of \(W\) at the endpoints.
Potential Function
For a conservative field we have \(\vec{F} = \vec{\nabla}W\), where \(W\) is the work function. In physics it is conventional to work instead with the potential energy\(\Phi\), defined as the negative of the work function:
The sign is not arbitrary: with this definition the force points in the direction of decreasing potential, so a ball rolls downhill and a positive charge moves away from another positive charge. Work done by the field lowers the potential energy, \(W(B)-W(A) = -[\Phi(B)-\Phi(A)]\), which is what makes \(\Phi\) the quantity that adds to kinetic energy to give a conserved total. Both conventions appear in the literature; the sign of the gradient must be checked whenever a potential is quoted.
Example
Show that \(\vec{F}\) where \(\vec{F}=-\vec{\nabla}\phi\).
We will (i) verify \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F}=\vec{0}\), (ii) find a scalar potential by component integration, and (iii) confirm the result by an explicit path integral from \((0,0,0)\) to \((x,y,z)\).
Hence \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F}=\vec{0}\). On a simply connected domain in \(\mathbb{R}^3\) (e.g. all of \(\mathbb{R}^3\)), this implies that \(\vec{F}\) is conservative.
Step 2 — Find the work function by component integration. We seek \(W\) with \(\vec{F}=\vec{\nabla}W\), so the three partial derivatives of \(W\) are the three components of \(\vec{F}\). Integrate the first one in \(x\), holding \(y\) and \(z\) fixed:
As a check, \(\vec{\nabla}W = (2xy-z^{3})\hat{i} + x^{2}\hat{j} - (3xz^{2}+1)\hat{k}
= \vec{F}\).
Step 3 — Confirm by an explicit path integral. Because \(\vec{F}\) is conservative we may choose any convenient path from the origin to \((x,y,z)\). Take three straight segments along the axes in turn, and set \(C=0\) so that \(W(0,0,0)=0\).
Segment 1, from \((0,0,0)\) to \((x,0,0)\) with \(y=z=0\): here \(d\vec{r}=dx'\,\hat{i}\) and \(F_x = 2x'(0)-0^{3}=0\), so this segment contributes nothing.
Segment 2, from \((x,0,0)\) to \((x,y,0)\): here \(d\vec{r}=dy'\,\hat{j}\) and \(F_y = x^{2}\), which is constant along the segment, so
Line integrals appear frequently in physics, where they often represent quantities such as work, circulation, or magnetic flux linkage.
Below are some important physical contexts where line integrals are used.
1. Work Done by a Force Field
\begin{equation}
W = \int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}
\end{equation}
This represents the work done by a force \(\vec{F}\) in moving a particle along a path \(C\).
2. Electrostatic Potential Energy
The electrostatic potential energy gained by moving a charge \(q\) through an electric field \(\vec{E}\) along a path \(C\) is
\begin{equation}
V = -\,q\int_C \vec{E}\cdot d\vec{r}.
\end{equation}
The negative sign indicates that the electric field does work against the potential difference.
3. Ampère’s Law (Magnetostatics)
The circulation of the magnetic field around a closed loop \(C\) is proportional to the current \(I\) enclosed by that loop:
\begin{equation}
\oint_C \vec{B}\cdot d\vec{r} = \mu_0 I.
\end{equation}
This integral form of Ampère’s law relates magnetic fields to the steady currents that produce them.
4. Magnetic Force on a Current Loop
A current-carrying wire placed in a magnetic field \(\vec{B}\) experiences a magnetic force given by
\begin{equation}
\vec{F} = I \oint_C d\vec{r} \times \vec{B}.
\end{equation}
This expression gives the total force on a loop of current \(I\) in a magnetic field. Each element of the wire experiences an infinitesimal force \(d\vec{F} = I\,d\vec{r}\times\vec{B}\).
6.7.11Surface and Volume Integrals
Surface Integrals
A surface integral generalizes the concept of a line integral to a two-dimensional surface. For a surface \(\sigma\) with unit normal vector \(\hat{n}\) and differential area element \(d\vec{\sigma} = \hat{n}\,d\sigma\), we can define three common types of surface integrals:
which represents the flux of the vector field \(\vec{F}\) through the surface \(S\). Physically, this measures how much of the field “flows” through \(S\). Only the normal component of \(\vec{F}\) contributes to the flux; tangential components make no contribution.
Figure 6.14. Flux through a surface: only the component of \(\vec{F}\) along the normal crosses \(S\), and the tangential component contributes nothing.
Volume Integrals
A volume integral extends the concept to three dimensions. For a scalar field \(\phi(x,y,z)\),
relating the integral of a derivative over an interval to the function’s change at its endpoints. In two dimensions, a similar idea holds: the integral of derivatives over an area \(A\) corresponds to function values along its boundary \(C\). This reasoning leads directly to Green’s Theorem.
Theorem - Green’s Theorem
If \(P(x,y)\) and \(Q(x,y)\) have continuous first partial derivatives in a simply connected region \(A\) bounded by a positively oriented closed curve \(C\), then
Part I: the term involving \(\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\).
Figure 6.15. Region bounded between \(y_1(x)\) and \(y_2(x)\) for \(x \in [a,b]\). The strip of width \(dx\) contributes to \(\int \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\,dy\).
Consider
\begin{equation}
I = \iint_A \frac{\partial P(x,y)}{\partial y}\,dx\,dy.
\end{equation}
Assume the region can be described by the equations
\begin{equation}
y_1(x) \le y \le y_2(x), \qquad a \le x \le b,
\end{equation}
so that
\begin{equation}
A = \{(x,y) \mid a \le x \le b,\; y_1(x) \le y \le y_2(x)\}.
\end{equation}
Along a vertical line (\(x=\text{const}\)), \(dx=0\) and \(dP = \frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\,dy\). Then
Part II: the term involving \(\frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\).
Figure 6.16. Region bounded between \(x_1(y)\) and \(x_2(y)\) for \(y \in [c,d]\). The strip of width \(dy\) contributes to \(\int \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\,dx\).
Consider
\begin{equation}
II = \iint_A \frac{\partial Q(x,y)}{\partial x}\,dx\,dy.
\end{equation}
Assume the region can also be described by
\begin{equation}
x_1(y) \le x \le x_2(y), \qquad c \le y \le d,
\end{equation}
so that
\begin{equation}
A = \{(x,y) \mid c \le y \le d,\; x_1(y) \le x \le x_2(y)\}.
\end{equation}
Along a horizontal line (\(y=\text{const}\)), \(dy=0\) and \(dQ = \frac{\partial Q}{\partial x}\,dx\). Then
The two parts must now be combined with care over signs. From Part I, \(I = -\oint_{\partial A} P\,dx\), so that \(\oint_{\partial A} P\,dx = -I\); from Part II, \(\oint_{\partial A} Q\,dy = II\). The boundary integral we want is therefore the difference\(II - I\), not the sum:
\begin{equation}
\oint_{\partial A} (P\,dx + Q\,dy)
= -I + II
= II - I .
\end{equation}
which is Green's theorem. The minus sign in front of \(\frac{\partial P}{\partial y}\) traces back to Part I, where traversing the boundary counterclockwise means the upper curve \(y_2(x)\) is crossed from right to left.
Physical Interpretation
The left-hand side represents the circulation of the vector field \(\vec{F}(x,y) = P(x,y)\,\hat{i} + Q(x,y)\,\hat{j}\) around the closed curve \(C\).
The right-hand side measures the total curl flux of \(\vec{F}\) through the enclosed region \(A\).
Hence, Green’s theorem states that the local rotation (curl) of a field sums to the total circulation along its boundary.
Remark
Green’s theorem generalizes the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus from 1D to 2D:
\begin{equation}
\text{Integral of a derivative over a region}
\quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad
\text{Function evaluated along the boundary.}
\end{equation}
Figure 6.17. The closed curve \(C\) bounding the region \(A\): out from the origin along \(x=2\sqrt{y}\) to \((2,1)\), back along the horizontal segment, and down the \(y\)-axis to the origin.
Compute the work \(W=\displaystyle\oint_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}\).
be a continuously differentiable vector field defined on a region \(A\) of the \(xy\)-plane, bounded by a positively oriented (counterclockwise) closed curve \(\partial A\).
To connect this with Green’s theorem, define
\begin{equation}
P = -F_y,
\qquad
Q = F_x.
\end{equation}
Then the combination appearing in Green’s theorem,
where \(ds = \sqrt{(dx)^2 + (dy)^2}\) is the differential arc length.
Figure 6.18. The outward normal on the boundary \(\partial A\): turning \(d\vec{r}\) through a quarter turn gives \(\hat{n}\,ds=\hat{i}\,dy-\hat{j}\,dx\).
This states that the total flux of \(\vec{F}\) through the boundary \(\partial A\) equals the integral of the divergence of \(\vec{F}\) over the enclosed region \(A\).
Extension to Three Dimensions (Gauss’s Theorem)
Theorem - Divergence Theorem in Three Dimensions
If \(\vec{F}(x,y,z)\) has continuous partial derivatives within a closed volume \(\tau\) bounded by a closed surface \(\sigma\), then
and let \(\tau\) be the solid right circular cylinder of radius \(R\) and height \(h\) whose axis is the \(z\)-axis, with bottom at \(z=0\) and top at \(z=h\). Its boundary \(\partial\tau=\sigma\) consists of three pieces:
Flux through the bottom disk \(S_1\) (at \(z=0\)). The outward normal is \(-\hat{k}\), and on \(S_1\) we have \(\vec{F}=\alpha(0)\hat{k}=\vec{0}\). Hence
Flux through the lateral surface \(S_3\) (\(\rho=R\)). Here \(d\vec{\sigma}=\hat{\rho}\,R\,d\phi\,dz\) (outward), while \(\vec{F}=\alpha z\,\hat{k}\) is parallel to \(\hat{k}\). Since \(\hat{k}\cdot\hat{\rho}=0\),
Figure 6.19. Stokes's theorem: the circulation of \(\vec{F}\) around the boundary equals the flux of \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F}\) through any surface spanning it.
This expresses that the circulation of \(\vec{F}\) around a closed boundary equals the total curl flux through the enclosed region.
Extension to Three Dimensions (General Stokes’s Theorem)
Theorem - Stokes’s Theorem in Three Dimensions
If \(\vec{F}\) has continuous partial derivatives on a smooth surface \(\sigma\) bounded by a positively oriented closed curve \(C\), then
The line integral \(\oint_{\partial \sigma} \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r}\) measures the circulation of \(\vec{F}\) along the boundary \(\partial \sigma\).
The surface integral \( \int_{\sigma} (\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F})\cdot d\vec{\sigma}\) measures the total curl flux through the surface \(\sigma\).
Stokes’s theorem connects the local rotation of a field to its global circulation.
Figure 6.20. A surface \(\sigma\) with element \(d\vec{\sigma}\) and unit normal \(\hat{n}\), bounded by the closed curve \(\partial\sigma\). The direction of the normal and the sense of the boundary are tied together by the right-hand rule.Example - Flux of the Curl over a Hemisphere — Direct Method and Stokes’s Theorem
Both the direct surface integration and Stokes’s theorem give the same result.
The negative sign indicates that the curl \((\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F})=-3\hat{k}\) points opposite to the outward normal of the upper hemisphere.
This example illustrates the power of Stokes’s theorem: the curved surface integral can be replaced by a much simpler line integral around the boundary.
6.9Maxwell’s Equations and the Continuity Equation
This expresses charge conservation: the rate of decrease of enclosed charge within the volume \(\tau\) equals the net outward current through its bounding closed surface \(\sigma\).
4. Physical Interpretation
Gauss’s law for \(\vec{E}\): electric flux through a closed surface equals the enclosed charge.
Gauss’s law for \(\vec{B}\): magnetic field lines form closed loops — no magnetic monopoles.
Faraday’s law: a changing magnetic flux induces an electric field (emf).
Ampère–Maxwell law: magnetic fields arise from currents and changing electric fields.
Continuity equation: charge is conserved — current outflow equals the decrease of enclosed charge.
These relations are essential in fluid dynamics, electromagnetism, and quantum mechanics. They enable transformations of differential equations, simplification of vector expressions, and conversions between integral and differential forms of physical laws.
6.11Where Vector Analysis Is Used
Maxwell's equations, treated twice in this chapter, are the clearest demonstration of what vector analysis is for: four statements about \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\) and \(\vec{\nabla}\times\) contain the whole of classical electromagnetism, including the existence of light. The same operators do similar work elsewhere.
Electromagnetism. Gauss's law is a statement about divergence, Faraday's and Ampère's about curl. The integral and differential forms are connected by exactly the divergence and Stokes's theorems proved here, which is why those theorems are not an optional extra.
Conservative forces and potentials.\(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec{F}=\vec 0\) is the test for whether a potential energy exists at all. Gravity and electrostatics pass; friction does not. This is what makes energy conservation usable.
Fluid dynamics. The divergence of the velocity field measures whether fluid is being compressed, and its curl measures local rotation — literally the rate at which a small paddle wheel would spin, as the rigid-rotation example showed.
Heat and diffusion. The Laplacian \(\nabla^2 T\) measures how much a point differs from the average of its neighbours, which is why it governs diffusion and why \(\nabla^2 T = 0\) describes steady state (Chapter 10).
Curvilinear coordinates. The general expressions for gradient, divergence and curl in orthogonal coordinates let the same physics be written in whatever coordinates match the symmetry of the problem, as in Chapter 5.
Remark
One idea unifies the integral theorems of this chapter. Green's theorem, the divergence theorem and Stokes's theorem all say the same thing: the accumulated derivative over a region equals the values on its boundary. In one dimension this is the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, \(\int_a^b f'\,dt = f(b)-f(a)\). Each theorem here is that statement in a higher dimension, with the derivative replaced by a divergence or a curl, and the endpoints by a closed curve or a closed surface.
For the Interested Reader
Vector analysis is where the geometry and the algebra can easily come apart: it is possible to compute a curl correctly for a whole course without ever picturing what it measures. The first item below is the strongest remedy for that. Everything listed is free.
Seeing divergence and curl
3Blue1Brown builds both operators from what they do to a flowing fluid, and then shows why Maxwell's equations say what they say. Twenty minutes here is worth a great deal of symbol-pushing:
Video
Divergence and curl: the language of Maxwell's equations — 3Blue1Brown
Paul's Online Math Notes.Line Integrals and Stokes' Theorem — practice at parametrising curves and surfaces, which is where most of the difficulty in these integrals actually lies.
Remark
A note on notation, since it varies more here than in any other chapter. Some books write \(\operatorname{grad}\phi\), \(\operatorname{div}\vec V\) and \(\operatorname{curl}\vec V\) where we write \(\vec{\nabla}\phi\), \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot\vec V\) and \(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec V\); others use \(\operatorname{rot}\vec V\) for the curl. The operator notation used here is worth preferring because it makes identities such as \(\vec{\nabla}\cdot(\vec{\nabla}\times\vec V)=0\) look like what they are — statements about repeated application of one operator.